Seasonal and interannual variability of climate and vegetation indices across the Amazon

17 de agosto de 2010

ago 17, 2010

Paulo M. Brando, Scott J. Goetz, Alessandro Baccini, Daniel C. Nepstad, Pieter S. A. Beck, Mary C. Christman

Drought exerts a strong influence on tropical forest metabolism, carbon stocks, and ultimately the flux of carbon to the atmosphere. Satellite-based studies have suggested that Amazon forests green up during droughts because of increased sunlight, whereas field studies have reported increased tree mortality during severe droughts. In an effort to reconcile these apparently conflicting findings, we conducted an analysis of climate data, field measurements, and improved satellite-based measures of forest photosynthetic activity.

Wet-season precipitation and plant-available water (PAW) decreased over the Amazon Basin from 1996−2005, and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and air dryness (expressed as vapor pressure deficit, VPD) increased from 2002–2005. Using improved enhanced vegetation index (EVI) measurements (2000–2008), we show that gross primary productivity (expressed as EVI) declined with VPD and PAW in regions of sparse canopy cover across a wide range of environments for each year of the study. In densely forested areas, no climatic variable adequately explained the Basin-wide interannual variability of EVI. Based on a site-specific study, we show that monthly EVI was relatively insensitive to leaf area index (LAI) but correlated positively with leaf flushing and PAR measured in the field.

These findings suggest that production of new leaves, even when unaccompanied by associated changes in LAI, could play an important role in Basin-wide interannual EVI variability. Because EVI variability was greatest in regions of lower PAW, we hypothesize that drought could increase EVI by synchronizing leaf flushing via its effects on leaf bud development.

Baixar (sujeito à disponibilidade)

Download (subject to availability)

Veja também

See also

Sugestões de aperfeiçoamento do Sicar para a implementação do Código Florestal

Sugestões de aperfeiçoamento do Sicar para a implementação do Código Florestal

Esse relatório avalia se o sistema atende os quatro elementos destacados previamente para a boa gestão ambiental: transparência, coordenação com outros entes/bases, prevenção de fraudes e prestação de contas (accountability). Os dados foram coletados em duas reuniões com o SFB (março de 20153 e fevereiro de 2016) e na legislação aplicável ao tema. O relatório também apresenta, quando pertinente, prática de outros órgãos governamentais (na esfera federal ou estadual) em temas semelhantes. Os resultados são apresentados a seguir a partir de cada um dos temas elencados, com indicações de problemas e recomendações de melhoria.