Does the disturbance hypothesis explain the biomass increase in basin-wide Amazon forest plot data?

4 de setembro de 2009

set 4, 2009

M. Gloor, O. L. Phillips, J. J. Lloyd, S. L. Lewis, Y. Malhi, T. R. Baker, G. López-Gonzalez, J. Peacock, S. Almeida, A. C. Alves De Oliveira, E. Alvarez, I. Amaral, L. Arroyo, G. Aymard, O. Banki, L. Blanc, D. Bonal, P. Brando, K.-J. Chao, J. Chave, N. Dávila, T. Erwin, J. Silva, A. Di Fiore, T. R. Feldpausch, A. Freitas, R. Herrera, N. Higuchi, E. Honorio, E. Jiménez, T. Killeen, W. Laurance, C. Mendoza, A. Monteagudo, A. Andrade, D. Neill, D. Nepstad, P. Núñez Vargas, M. C. Peñuela, A. Peña Cruz, A. Prieto, N. Pitman, C. Quesada, R. Salomão, Marcos Silveira, M. Schwarz, J. Stropp, F. Ramírez, H. Ramírez, A. Rudas, H. Ter Steege, N. Silva, A. Torres, J. Terborgh, R. Vásquez, G. Van Der Heijden

Positive aboveground biomass trends have been reported from old-growth forests across the Amazon basin and hypothesized to reflect a large-scale response to exterior forcing. The result could, however, be an artefact due to a sampling bias induced by the nature of forest growth dynamics. Here, we characterize statistically the disturbance process in Amazon old-growth forests as recorded in 135 forest plots of the RAINFOR network up to 2006, and other independent research programmes, and explore the consequences of sampling artefacts using a data-based stochastic simulator. Over the observed range of annual aboveground biomass losses, standard statistical tests show that the distribution of biomass losses through mortality follow an exponential or near-identical Weibull probability distribution and not a power law as assumed by others.

The simulator was parameterized using both an exponential disturbance probability distribution as well as a mixed exponential–power law distribution to account for potential large-scale blowdown events. In both cases, sampling biases turn out to be too small to explain the gains detected by the extended RAINFOR plot network. This result lends further support to the notion that currently observed biomass gains for intact forests across the Amazon are actually occurring over large scales at the current time, presumably as a response to climate change.

Leia o artigo completo.

Read the full article.

Baixar (sujeito à disponibilidade)

Download (subject to availability)



Este projeto está alinhado aos Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável (ODS).

Saiba mais em brasil.un.org/pt-br/sdgs.

Veja também

See also

Posição comum em escala de REDD+

Posição comum em escala de REDD+

O IPAM, juntamente com suas instituições parceiras: Conservação Internacional, Environmental Defense Fund, Woods Hole Research Center e The Nature Conservancy, produziu quatro documentos de posições comuns sobre aspectos da política de REDD. Este é sobre a Posição Comum em Escala de REDD+.

Brazil’s “Low-Carbon Agriculture” Program: Barries to implementation

Brazil’s “Low-Carbon Agriculture” Program: Barries to implementation

Brazil launched the “Low-Carbon Agriculture” Plan and a special line of credit: the ABC Program. However, the program has been slow in getting off the ground. To understand why, the Amazon Environmental Research Institute (IPAM) conducted more than forty interviews with members of various producer, cooperative, association and industry groups, as well as the government.