Brazil's Forest Code – Assessment 2012-2016

21 de dezembro de 2016

dez 21, 2016

After almost five years, the Forest Code brought about important progress to land use regulation in rural estate properties. But there is an infinity of challenges ahead for Brazil to actually advance in the implementation of the Code.

Baixar (sujeito à disponibilidade)

Download (subject to availability)

Veja também

See also

Assessing compliance with the Forest Code: A practical guide

Assessing compliance with the Forest Code: A practical guide

The goal of this guide is to help buyers of Brazilian forestry and agricultural commodities to verify compliance with the Brazilian Forest Code in their supply chain. It presents a range of available and evolving tools to ensure compliance with the Forest Code in the supply chain. The tools described are credible and practical instruments that buyers can use without the need for legal or environmental specialists. In this way, the private sector can support the transition to legal compliance in Brazil’s rural environment, also with the benefit of promoting commodities produced in Brazil in the domestic and international markets.

Authors: Pedro Amaral (Proforest), Tiago Reis (IPAM) e Roberta del Giudice (Instituto BVRio).

A social-ecological approach to identify and quantify biodiversity tipping points in South America’s seasonal dry ecosystems

A social-ecological approach to identify and quantify biodiversity tipping points in South America’s seasonal dry ecosystems

Tropical dry forests and savannas harbour unique biodiversity and provide critical ES, yet they are under severe pressure globally. We need to improve our understanding of how and when this pressure provokes tipping points in biodiversity and the associated...

Posición conjunta sobre los beneficios ecológicos colaterales de REDD+

Posición conjunta sobre los beneficios ecológicos colaterales de REDD+

El IPAM, junto con las instituciones asociadas: Conservation International, Environmental Defense Fund, Woods Hole Research Center y The Nature Conservancy, ha elaborado cuatro documentos de posición común sobre cuestiones de política en la REDD. Esto es sobre la El IPAM, junto con las instituciones asociadas: Conservation International, Environmental Defense Fund, Woods Hole Research Center y The Nature Conservancy, ha elaborado cuatro documentos de posición común sobre cuestiones de política en la REDD. Esto es sobre la posición común sobre los co-beneficios ecológicos de el REDD +.