Does the disturbance hypothesis explain the biomass increase in basin-wide Amazon forest plot data?

4 de setembro de 2009

set 4, 2009

M. Gloor, O. L. Phillips, J. J. Lloyd, S. L. Lewis, Y. Malhi, T. R. Baker, G. López-Gonzalez, J. Peacock, S. Almeida, A. C. Alves De Oliveira, E. Alvarez, I. Amaral, L. Arroyo, G. Aymard, O. Banki, L. Blanc, D. Bonal, P. Brando, K.-J. Chao, J. Chave, N. Dávila, T. Erwin, J. Silva, A. Di Fiore, T. R. Feldpausch, A. Freitas, R. Herrera, N. Higuchi, E. Honorio, E. Jiménez, T. Killeen, W. Laurance, C. Mendoza, A. Monteagudo, A. Andrade, D. Neill, D. Nepstad, P. Núñez Vargas, M. C. Peñuela, A. Peña Cruz, A. Prieto, N. Pitman, C. Quesada, R. Salomão, Marcos Silveira, M. Schwarz, J. Stropp, F. Ramírez, H. Ramírez, A. Rudas, H. Ter Steege, N. Silva, A. Torres, J. Terborgh, R. Vásquez, G. Van Der Heijden

Positive aboveground biomass trends have been reported from old-growth forests across the Amazon basin and hypothesized to reflect a large-scale response to exterior forcing. The result could, however, be an artefact due to a sampling bias induced by the nature of forest growth dynamics. Here, we characterize statistically the disturbance process in Amazon old-growth forests as recorded in 135 forest plots of the RAINFOR network up to 2006, and other independent research programmes, and explore the consequences of sampling artefacts using a data-based stochastic simulator. Over the observed range of annual aboveground biomass losses, standard statistical tests show that the distribution of biomass losses through mortality follow an exponential or near-identical Weibull probability distribution and not a power law as assumed by others.

The simulator was parameterized using both an exponential disturbance probability distribution as well as a mixed exponential–power law distribution to account for potential large-scale blowdown events. In both cases, sampling biases turn out to be too small to explain the gains detected by the extended RAINFOR plot network. This result lends further support to the notion that currently observed biomass gains for intact forests across the Amazon are actually occurring over large scales at the current time, presumably as a response to climate change.

Leia o artigo completo.

Read the full article.

Baixar (sujeito à disponibilidade)

Download (subject to availability)



Este projeto está alinhado aos Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável (ODS).

Saiba mais em brasil.un.org/pt-br/sdgs.

Veja também

See also

Desenvolvimento territorial – Diretrizes para a região da BR-163 – Volume 2

Desenvolvimento territorial – Diretrizes para a região da BR-163 – Volume 2

Consiste na segunda compilação de uma série de artigos acadêmicos produzidos no âmbito do Projeto Diálogos por pesquisadores membros das instituições que compõem o consórcio WWF-Brasil, Instituto Centro Vida (ICV),Centro de Cooperação Internacional em Pesquisa Agronômica para o Desenvolvimento(Cirad), Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia(IPAM)e Centro de Desenvolvimento Sustentável da Universidade de Brasília(CDS/UnB).

Indigenous Peoples and the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) mechanism in the Brazilian Amazon – Subsidies to the Discussion of Benefits Sharing

Indigenous Peoples and the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) mechanism in the Brazilian Amazon – Subsidies to the Discussion of Benefits Sharing

The purpose of this publication is to provide a better understanding on the contribution of indigenous perspectives to the discussion of REDD+ benefit sharing, based on some indig- enous’ points of view and experiences of the Amazon indigenous peoples in Brazil. More specifically, the aim from a participatory and consultative process is to provide support for the construction benefit sharing models for REDD+ programs, which actually promotes inclu- sion of these people, focusing on the Brazilian context.