Brazil’s Emerging Sectoral Framework for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation and the Potential to Deliver Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions from Avoided Deforestation in the Amazon’s Xingu River Basin

20 de outubro de 2010

out 20, 2010

Daniel Nepstad, Claudia M. Stickler, Andrea Cattaneo, Tracy Johns, John O. Niles, Ane Alencar, Osvaldo Stella, André Nahur, David Tepper

This technical update highlights the results of research conducted by Woods Hole Research Center (WHRC) for the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) in 2009 and 2010 to support research on the development of a potential GHG emissions reduction project to reduce deforestation in the Xingu River basin in Brazil’s Amazon region.

The report summarizes research and analysis conducted on the emerging market for GHG emissions offsets derived from activities to reduce deforestation and forest degradation. It presents analysis of the potential for large-scale emissions reductions in the Xingu River basin of the eastern Amazon region.

The report provides insights on the issues of property rights to carbon offsets, calculation of emission baselines for potential future REDD-based projects, carbon offset program registration, the development of a new sectoral “nesting” architecture through which pilot forest carbon projects could link to state- and national-level REDD programs, and the financial architecture that could link REDD-based projects to emerging cap-and-trade policies.

Relatório em inglês para o Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI).

IPAM, Woods Hole Research Center, Forest Trends e Tropical Forest Group. A Nova Estrutura Setorial Brasileira para Redução de Emissões por Desmatamento e Degradação (REDD) e a Potencial Redução de Emissões por Desmatamento Evitado na Região do Xingu. Outubro, 2010.

Baixar (sujeito à disponibilidade)

Download (subject to availability)

Veja também

See also

The potential ecological costs and cobenefits of REDD: a critical review and case study from the Amazon region

The potential ecological costs and cobenefits of REDD: a critical review and case study from the Amazon region

Analysis of possible REDD program interventions in a large-scale Amazon landscape indicates that even modest flows of forest carbon funding can provide substantial cobenefits for aquatic ecosystems, but that the functional integrity of the landscape’s myriad small watersheds would be best protected under a more even spatial distribution of forests. Because of its focus on an ecosystem service with global benefits, REDD could access a large pool of global stakeholders willing to pay to maintain carbon in forests, thereby providing a potential cascade of ecosystem services to local stakeholders who would otherwise be unable to afford them.

Who owns Brazilian lands?

Who owns Brazilian lands?

Land tenure in many parts of Brazil remains uncertain and controversial. These problems have recently been exacerbated by changes in the legal framework regulating protected areas and the land market. A particular challenge facing attempts to improve land tenure...