Posición conjunta sobre opciones de financiación de REDD+

9 de novembro de 2009

nov 9, 2009

El IPAM, junto con las instituciones asociadas: Conservation International, Environmental Defense Fund, Woods Hole Research Center y The Nature Conservancy, ha elaborado cuatro documentos de posición común sobre cuestiones de política en la REDD. Esto es sobre la posición conjunta sobre opciones de financiación de REDD+.

Una alternativa poderosa para cambiar los incentivos económicos que promueven la destrucción de los bosques y así contribuir a la reducción global de emisiones estaría a la vista dados exigentes compromisos de reducción de emisiones de los países industrializados en la fase posterior a 2012, sumados a intensas actividades de mitigación con REDD+.

IPAM; Conservación Internacional; Environmental Defense Fund; Woods Hole Research Center; The Nature Conservancy. 2009.

Baixar (sujeito à disponibilidade)

Download (subject to availability)

Veja também

See also

Institutional subversion and deforestation: learning lessons from the system for the environmental licensing of rural properties in Mato Grosso

Institutional subversion and deforestation: learning lessons from the system for the environmental licensing of rural properties in Mato Grosso

This article contributes to the public administration and environmental governance literature by proposing the notion of ‘institutional subversion’ as a way of describing how the strategies adopted by local actors may change and even go against the initial aims of...

Stimulating Interim Demand for REDD+ Emission Reductions: The Need for a Strategic Intervention Pre 2020

Stimulating Interim Demand for REDD+ Emission Reductions: The Need for a Strategic Intervention Pre 2020

A report from the Interim Forest Finance Project – a collaboration of the Global Canopy Programme, the Amazon Environmental Research Institute, Fauna & Flora International, and UNEP Finance Initiative - reveals that demand for REDD+ emission reductions could be as little as 3% of the supply between 2015 and 2020. The report explains the risks of doing nothing, and outlines a suite of options for increasing demand.